Send a study back for re-extraction in Dual Extraction#446

I tried this out and wasn’t sure if this was the intended behavior. I completed 2/3 studies in extaction (using two different accounts) and adjudicated 2 of the studies. I then tried to set the extraction module to incomplete to kick the two studies back to the reviewers and then put it back in the queue for adjudication. However, there was no change in module status upon doing the bulk action. I think this might be confusing to some users.

Is it possible for the request to bulk incomplete a module to kick the studies back to extraction and then back to the adjudicators? Thoughts?

This is a good question– I tried it myself, and it puts the study back into the queue for Adjudication. That makes sense to me as a Module Status, since it simply reverts to the state the study was in before it was Completed (i.e., being Adjudicated).

I do hear the request, though, for a way to “Send a study back”, both for individual studies and in bulk. I’ve changed the title above, and would love to get people’s level of interest in that function!

Thanks for surfacing Nicole - bulk actions currently only operate on “final” data. So your bulk action sent the studies back to the adjudication queue (one step back from final), not back to reviewer-level extraction (2 steps back from final). We have the same limitation with dual screening. We’re thinking it would be nice to have the following bulk action options for screeening status & module status:

• Unscreen/mark incomplete, final (adjudicated) data only
• Unscreen/mark incomplete, your reviewer level data only
  • Only available when the module is dual-configured
• Unscreen/mark incomplete, all data (reviewer-level + final)
  • Only available when the moduile is dual-configured

This would be great!

Added in release 1.46.2. Thanks for the feedback :)