I’m bibliomining studies via adding other sources (the bibliomining tool has saved us a ton of time, but we have a some pdfs that just aren’t playing nice with it), and I’m running into a pretty frequent scenario where I’m adding a study by PMID or DOI that has already been added from another review. When that happens, the search execution box pops up, and then goes away, and it looks like nothing’s happened- it doesn’t give any indication that the study was matched to one already in the nest, and it doesn’t add/move the study to the top of the other sources list. It makes it hard to tell that the job has completed correctly, rather than running into an error.
My ideas for how to change this would be to either display a “matched to previous study” notification for long enough to be read, or to bump the study to the top of the list of added studies when it’s re-added, but I’m sure there are other options that would work as well!


Great point, something we hadn’t considered but I can see what you’re describing & the frustration it would bring. Yea, perhaps we highlight + autoscroll to that row of the table?

That might be nice, regardless of if the record matched an existing record or not - a small indicator of what was brought into your nest.
I like that idea as well, just scrolling down and highlighting the existing row to acknowledge that it’s been identified. Thanks Karl!